DEPARTMENT POLICY ON ANNUAL REVIEW OF INSTRUCTORS
FROM THE NAU HANDBOOK/CONDITIONS OF FACULTY SERVICE
2.4.1 Membership
The membership of the university Faculty, hereinafter referred to as the
Faculty, is determined by the definition of Faculty in the
Conditions of Faculty Service document of the Arizona Board of Regents. The
Faculty shall mean all employees of Northern Arizona University in teaching,
research, or service, whose notice of appointment is instructor, lecturer, senior
lecturer, assistant professor, associate professor, professor,
Regents professor or who are otherwise designated as Faculty on the Notice
of
7.4.6 Annual Faculty Performance Evaluation Procedures
Annual Faculty Performance Evaluations shall be conducted according to the
following guidelines:
1. Every faculty member at NAU (full-time and part-time, tenure-eligible, or
nontenure-eligible, including faculty with administrative responsibilities),
shall be reviewed and evaluated annually. The appropriate academic unit administrator
(chair or dean/director for non-departmentalized units) is responsible for providing
the faculty member with a list of essential materials for the annual faculty
performance evaluation.
2. Every faculty member shall be evaluated in each of the areas specified in
the faculty members Statement of Expectations on a four point scale, with
one (1) corresponding to an unsatisfactory rating and four (4) corresponding
to a rating of highly meritorious. The four categories for rating performance
are highly meritorious, meritorious, satisfactory, unsatisfactory.
3. Departments/colleges/schools/academic units determine review and evaluation
criteria. The criteria will be made available to the faculty member.
4. The measurement of overall performance shall be based on the three areas
of (1) student-related responsibilities, (2) scholarship, creative activity,
and/or professional development, and (3) service. No faculty member can be rated
unsatisfactory overall
unless he or she is rated unsatisfactory in one or more areas. Whether a rating
of unsatisfactory in one or more areas is a basis for an overall evaluation
of unsatisfactory will depend upon the percentage of the faculty members
efforts
assigned to those area(s) in the Statement of Expectations. The results of the
evaluation may necessitate a modification of the Statement of
Expectations for the faculty member, which would require the signature of the
parties to that document.
5. The Annual Faculty Performance Evaluation shall be conducted during the
semester following the year being evaluated.
6. The Annual Review Committee shall provide a written copy of the recommendation
to the chair (or dean/director) who shall supply a copy of the decision to the
faculty member.
7. The academic unit administrator shall review the accomplishments of each
faculty member as well as the recommendation of the review committee and make
a decision regarding the performance evaluation for each faculty member.
8. Upon receipt of the recommendation of the committee, the faculty member
shall have the option to:
a. Submit a written response to the academic unit administrator within five
(5) working days of receipt of the written recommendation; or,
b. Make no response.
9. Upon receipt of the decision of the academic unit administrator, the faculty
member shall have the option to:
a. Submit a written appeal to the next level in the administration within five
(5) working days; or,
b. Make no response.
FROM THE PERSONNEL ACTION CALENDAR
ANNUAL REVIEWS
NOTE: This calendar is for all faculty except 1st year faculty since they
have not fulfilled a previous Statement of Expectation. See the special note
regarding 1st year faculty under the calendar for Faculty.